Kvek wrote:Caeltos wrote:Because it's an over investment in a unit that's useless against the t2 and t3 gk rooster?
Ah yes, Snipers are useless against a faction that has high req/per model, and has no means to reinforce on the field, unless they have a LRC.
You are suggesting that to counter a 350/30 unit that, for that price alone counters 450/125 which are walkers
Devastators/Havoc/Shurikens/etc have progressive utility, and when upgraded deal with walkers/vehicles and whatnot. And they're cheaper, but that's okay?
(Ranged Walkers will be more potent to trade with the Vindicare, or punish)
1.Snipers are useless against the
t2 and t3 gk rooster...2. They are okay because they don't fuck HI/INF after they kill the vehicle, and they also need to setup.
1. I disagree completely. Snipers are quite alright as a progressive sustain dps versus SHI like Terminators. They're vulnerable to the jump, sure - but snipers were common-ground as a anti-SHI unit in the old days. They still are, but they're just not maybe optimal compared to the other purchases. Overall, the sniper has a fundemental and strong general design by nature to be strong against GK's overall T1 and
T2 transitional play. It's like saying fucking Plasma Gun Tacs are shit against T3 Chaos because they have nothing but Tanks. It's completely disregarding the transitional play and figuring out the army comps that follow.
It's so fucking stupid beyond my wildest imagination.
2. I don't think people understand the phrase of continous progression. And of course, the difference between specialist/generalist unit.
Interceptors are a must have vs everyone but IG, and sometimes they are still extremely good vs them aswell.
No, they're not a must-have. If it's a preference for people, that's their choice. Not a must-have. I've seen games without them, and they do just fine. Thus the phrase "must-have" is completely and utterly pointless.
I'm getting tired of people hyperboling and making stupid shit up. Do your research before throwing in figures for "comparison" sake, or the simplistic narrow-minded tunnelvisioning is so aggrovating that I'm losing my temper. Or the god damn "Theorycrafted well-made up situation that is in favor of my arguement" is so fucking mindboggling childish and stupid.
Seriously, I've said it before and I'm getting really tired of some peoples bullshit by now, and here's what I've got to say.
Don't like the existing
BETA? do the following
A) Play previous beta
B) Accept that it's a beta and things are developing along the way
C) Uninstall
Do A - I don't care, you've pretty much proved to be useless as a source of viable feedback if you're complaining about things that are not set-in-stone anyway
Do B - Good, now we're making progress.
Do C - I don't care.
Like I said before, I'm even contradicting what I've said before, and I haven't come around to setting up new balance forum/rules. You never reach a concensus on anything when trying to discuss things, it's just one side throwing rocks at another one person that throws more rocks at you. It's completely and utterly pointless for the most part. And I don't know why I'm even engulfed in this nonsense.
No-setup is staying by the way. New & fresh approach. And I'm liking it personally
