Patch 2.3 Balance changelog

Issues dealing with gameplay balance.
Atlas

Re: Patch 2.3 - Tentative Balance changelog

Postby Atlas » Fri 28 Mar, 2014 8:28 pm

This has become a very meaty changelog now. My major concern is that general consensus is that the Tyranid economy is too solid and I don't know how to feel about the price reductions across a lot of the T1 options Tyranids are receiving now. Other than that, excited to play!
User avatar
Caeltos
Moderator
Posts: 1070
Joined: Sun 03 Feb, 2013 10:49 pm

Re: Patch 2.3 - Tentative Balance changelog

Postby Caeltos » Fri 28 Mar, 2014 8:35 pm

Atlas wrote:This has become a very meaty changelog now. My major concern is that general consensus is that the Tyranid economy is too solid and I don't know how to feel about the price reductions across a lot of the T1 options Tyranids are receiving now. Other than that, excited to play!


Yeah, meaty changelogs are fun, but alot of the portion is just based on itterations that are generally across the board. It could be reduced in text-size if I just summarized that terminators across the board recieved some substantial changes. Apart from that, some are just detailed descriptions that tells you that some animations are being changed (or at least visually)

The price-cut on tyranids horma/termagants are abit "experimental" seeing as they're definately more prone to bleed, and are seeing less early-game power-spike. I try to emulate a picture in the sense it's going to go from somewhere from;

-------------------^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

to the following

______-----------^^^^^^^^^^^^

More similiar to the Eldar power-spikes that come from upgrade/sergeants. They're more vulnerable to bleed, but less efficient in-early game combat, resulting in possible less map domination - resulting of course in less overall requisition income in total.

I could elaborate abit further, but one thing I want to push further is to shove tyranids more into a swarmy-cannonfodder meatype unit, and utilize heavier-grunt troops for the heavy-hitting. Not neccasarily however, replacing them. (The rare ones for the cannonfodder) hench their price-cuts.
User avatar
MaxPower
Contributor
Posts: 614
Joined: Mon 11 Feb, 2013 10:18 pm
Location: Leipzig

Re: Patch 2.3 - Tentative Balance changelog

Postby MaxPower » Fri 28 Mar, 2014 8:40 pm

Quick question, it is still possible to "spam" GK terminators and Paladins, right? Nothing like a build time increase or something like a cool down until you could build another one of them?

The thing is that Chaos Terminators and their loyal counterpart got a nerf with that 2 min + on their cool down, meaning its prolly not that viable to "spam" no GK terminators anymore.
"A fortress is built with blood and toil. Only by blood and toil may it be taken." Leman Russ
Helios
Level 3
Posts: 220
Joined: Mon 18 Feb, 2013 1:37 am

Re: Patch 2.3 - Tentative Balance changelog

Postby Helios » Fri 28 Mar, 2014 8:45 pm

Weren't there some Ogryn changes incoming?
User avatar
Cheekie Monkie
Level 3
Posts: 362
Joined: Thu 09 Jan, 2014 2:58 pm

Re: Patch 2.3 - Tentative Balance changelog

Postby Cheekie Monkie » Fri 28 Mar, 2014 8:58 pm

* Thunderhammer damage increased from 125 to 150 (dps from 62.5 to 75)

Eep. What's the reasoning behind this change? Did it not smack enough face already?

Looking forward to the GK changes. Here's hoping that the ST plasma won't be too spammable with both the canticool and the SS Sergeant.
Playing truth or dare with Diomedes: You dare? YOU DARE?!
Tinder with Diomedes: THINK YOU ARE MY MATCH?!
User avatar
Lost Son of Nikhel
Contributor
Posts: 636
Joined: Wed 13 Feb, 2013 4:26 pm
Location: The Warp

Re: Patch 2.3 - Tentative Balance changelog

Postby Lost Son of Nikhel » Fri 28 Mar, 2014 9:47 pm

- Plague Marine squad size reduced from 4 to 3 (pop reduced from 16 to 15) (general stats unchanged)

That "general stats unchanged" include damage and hp? Where I don't agree with increase the HP per member for their current high hp/hp regeneration, the current melee/ranged damage of the no-rocket launcher models is quite pathetic, and is going to be even more pathetic if you reduce in 1 the model size of the squad.

I suggest increase the two bolter models dps to the current three bolter models dps one.
"Pater, peccavi in caelum et coram te; iam non sum dignus vocari filius tuus". Dixit autem pater: "manducemus et epulemur, quia hic filius meus mortuus erat et revixit, perierat et inventus est"

There will be no forgiveness for us.
User avatar
Dark Riku
Level 5
Posts: 3083
Joined: Sun 03 Feb, 2013 10:48 pm
Location: Belgium

Re: Patch 2.3 - Tentative Balance changelog

Postby Dark Riku » Fri 28 Mar, 2014 10:14 pm

Caeltos wrote:* All melee oriented walkers now have melee resistance
* Dreadnoughts + Venerable , Chaos Dreadnought, Deff Dredd , Carnifex
So they lose it with a ranged upgrade right? (as said in the other thread)
It should include the wraithlord without a ranged upgrade :p
Caeltos wrote:Imperial Guard
* Bunker Health reduced from 750 to 500
This strikes me as odd. That thing is already fragile enough as it is.
What's the reasoning behind this change?


Lost Son of Nikhel wrote:- Plague Marine squad size reduced from 4 to 3 (pop reduced from 16 to 15) (general stats unchanged)
This would suggest that their dps isn't changed. So the 2 bolter models will be doing more damage individually. No worries :D


The wall of texts quotes and plus 1's are cute, useless and clogging up the thread's real intention.

Just to respond to one of the big flaws:
That Torpid Gamer wrote:Hahahaha the proposition that IG win instantly because you spent 60 power on snipers! Hooheehee, if the ork buys stormboyz+painboy in t1 alongside double big shootas then the ork obv has lost because that's like 65 power excluding the big shootas!
2 snipers don't provide you any pressure. How the hell are they going to push of the IG player? let alone genbash -.- If you can't see how your thinking pattern and comparisons here are completely flawed . . . Yeah, not wasting my time. Continue with the topic at hand.
Last edited by Dark Riku on Fri 28 Mar, 2014 10:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Forestradio
Level 5
Posts: 1157
Joined: Sun 13 Oct, 2013 5:09 pm

Re: Patch 2.3 - Tentative Balance changelog

Postby Forestradio » Fri 28 Mar, 2014 10:16 pm

MaxPower wrote:Quick question, it is still possible to "spam" GK terminators and Paladins, right? Nothing like a build time increase or something like a cool down until you could build another one of them?



Sure, give GK a predator and then we can start talking about it.

I'm a bit confused about the removal of Hammerhand for GK Terminators and the introduction of the new ability: is it like Farseer Levitation field?
crazyman64335
Shoutcaster
Posts: 329
Joined: Mon 06 May, 2013 2:15 am

Re: Patch 2.3 - Tentative Balance changelog

Postby crazyman64335 » Fri 28 Mar, 2014 10:55 pm

to be honest i've NEVER seen any GK player get more than 2 terminators, soooo yea.

Drop Pod now drops a squad of Tactical Space Marine squad

this must be what you meant when you said you were slightly drunk in our games :lol:
User avatar
MaxPower
Contributor
Posts: 614
Joined: Mon 11 Feb, 2013 10:18 pm
Location: Leipzig

Re: Patch 2.3 - Tentative Balance changelog

Postby MaxPower » Fri 28 Mar, 2014 10:56 pm

Don't GK have a tank in t2 with a nice lascannon? Sure its not as hard hitting as your normal Pred or anything, but it is available come t2.

So yeah, I fulfilled you your wish, so back to my question then, will gk Terminators/Paladins get something like a cooldown on build time or something or make em so that they can only get 1 of each or something?
"A fortress is built with blood and toil. Only by blood and toil may it be taken." Leman Russ
User avatar
Torpid
Moderator
Posts: 3538
Joined: Sat 01 Jun, 2013 12:09 pm
Location: England, Leeds

Re: Patch 2.3 - Tentative Balance changelog

Postby Torpid » Fri 28 Mar, 2014 10:58 pm

MaxPower wrote:Don't GK have a tank in t2 with a nice lascannon? Sure its not as hard hitting as your normal Pred or anything, but it is available come t2.

So yeah, I fulfilled you your wish, so back to my question then, will gk Terminators/Paladins get something like a cooldown on build time or something or make em so that they can only get 1 of each or something?


Don't SM already get spammable terminators in the name of vanguards/sternguards? Sure, they don't hit quite as hard as terminators but they're available in early t3/t2 respectively and are quite a bit cheaper.
Lets make Ordo Malleus great again!
L0thar
Level 2
Posts: 99
Joined: Wed 29 Jan, 2014 7:54 pm

Re: Patch 2.3 - Tentative Balance changelog

Postby L0thar » Fri 28 Mar, 2014 11:06 pm

* Drop Pod cost increased from 100 to 350
* Drop Pod no longer reinforces units when it lands
* Drop Pod still can still reinforce units
* Drop Pod now drops a squad of Tactical Space Marine squad


:(

I was really hoping this wouldn't get through. Seems like a big nerf in versatility for reasons I already stated in the DP thread. The overall reaction from community also didn't seem that excited like for the Plague Marine changes.

Also the actual saving on the tact squad doesn't seem so great. But I kind of like that it doesn't come with the sergeant. While more useful right after the call in, he is kind of a burden if you need tact for the missile launcher or plasma gun.

What happened with the theoretical temporary buff? It looked like a nice idea.

I don't want to sound too negative - I really like majority of the changes. Just this one means I'm basically stuck with one global (FtE) if going 2 tact as FC (which I like to do).
User avatar
Batpimp
Level 4
Posts: 672
Joined: Wed 10 Jul, 2013 7:06 pm
Location: Washington State
Contact:

Re: Patch 2.3 - Tentative Balance changelog

Postby Batpimp » Fri 28 Mar, 2014 11:07 pm

L0thar wrote:
* Drop Pod cost increased from 100 to 350
* Drop Pod no longer reinforces units when it lands
* Drop Pod still can still reinforce units
* Drop Pod now drops a squad of Tactical Space Marine squad


:(

I was really hoping this wouldn't get through. Seems like a big nerf in versatility for reasons I already stated in the DP thread. The overall reaction from community also didn't seem that excited like for the Plague Marine changes.

Also the actual saving on the tact squad doesn't seem so great. But I kind of like that it doesn't come with the sergeant. While more useful right after the call in, he is kind of a burden if you need tact for the missile launcher or plasma gun.

What happened with the theoretical temporary buff? It looked like a nice idea.

I don't want to sound too negative - I really like majority of the changes. Just this one means I'm basically stuck with one global (FtE) if going 2 tact as FC (which I like to do).



I actually like it more. Not everyone that reads responds
Eternal Crusade code 4 extra points FOR YOU!:
EC-ULA1Q6C1USBP0
twitch.tv/batpimp/
twitter: @Batpimpn
Starter guide viewtopic.php?f=11&t=877
Advanced strategy viewtopic.php?f=2&t=718
User avatar
Fr33man1800
Level 2
Posts: 111
Joined: Sun 23 Jun, 2013 1:05 pm

Re: Patch 2.3 - Tentative Balance changelog

Postby Fr33man1800 » Fri 28 Mar, 2014 11:10 pm

I agree with most of the changes but i dont really understand the reasoning behind the change of the IG bunker,t really is super fragile a simple P.Dev , wraithguard, tank busta barrage and most other abilities alredy wipe the bunker out extremely fast.

Also the bunker can be stolen and the only time perhaps I will see it as overpreforming if u get it fast on t1 and camp a strategic area like VP or natural power, else on T2 there is plenty of ways of get rid of the bunker. I dont think if this change is implemented getting a bunker will make any sense after T2 since with the extremely low health and the fact that cost red and it cant move its better to get a chimera.
User avatar
Dark Riku
Level 5
Posts: 3083
Joined: Sun 03 Feb, 2013 10:48 pm
Location: Belgium

Re: Patch 2.3 - Tentative Balance changelog

Postby Dark Riku » Fri 28 Mar, 2014 11:10 pm

That Torpid Gamer wrote:Don't SM already get spammable terminators in the name of vanguards/sternguards?
No. And you can't have more than 1 either.
That Torpid Gamer wrote:and are quite a bit cheaper.
Terminators 650/100/350
Vanguard: 650/105/0 (excluding meltabomb, loss of levels, reinforces...)
Sternguard: 625/55/0 (excluding any other upgrade, loss of levels, reinforces ...)

Yeah, soo much cheaper...
User avatar
Torpid
Moderator
Posts: 3538
Joined: Sat 01 Jun, 2013 12:09 pm
Location: England, Leeds

Re: Patch 2.3 - Tentative Balance changelog

Postby Torpid » Fri 28 Mar, 2014 11:16 pm

Caeltos wrote:Imperial Guard
* Bunker Health reduced from 750 to 500
Dark Riku wrote:This strikes me as odd. That thing is already fragile enough as it is.
What's the reasoning behind this change?


I think it's fair to be honest. The bunker is mad strong at the moment on a hell of a load of maps where you can put in positions where it just can't be destroyed. Also it takes a good few artillery shots to kill it right now and I do think it's a bit too many really.
Dark Riku wrote:The wall of texts quotes and plus 1's are cute, useless and clogging up the thread's real intention.

Just to respond to one of the big flaws:
That Torpid Gamer wrote:Hahahaha the proposition that IG win instantly because you spent 60 power on snipers! Hooheehee, if the ork buys stormboyz+painboy in t1 alongside double big shootas then the ork obv has lost because that's like 65 power excluding the big shootas!
2 snipers don't provide you any pressure. How the hell are they going to push of the IG player? let alone genbash -.- If you can't see how your thinking pattern and comparisons here are completely flawed . . . Yeah, not wasting my time. Continue with the topic at hand.


Well, the snipers are dealing with that which otherwise counters your composition. They are keeping the sentinel at bay so that you hero/tacs don't lose too much hp moving into and destroying the gen farm and they're also acting as a counter to catachans/hwts/spotters which all in all makes it much easier for your tacs to get their job done when burning that farm.

That's a pretty good analogy to what stormboyz/painboy do for an ork t1 build - themselves they don't do great at gen-bashing but they open up the opportunity to bash with your other units for sure.
Lets make Ordo Malleus great again!
User avatar
Forestradio
Level 5
Posts: 1157
Joined: Sun 13 Oct, 2013 5:09 pm

Re: Patch 2.3 - Tentative Balance changelog

Postby Forestradio » Fri 28 Mar, 2014 11:48 pm

MaxPower wrote:Don't GK have a tank in t2 with a nice lascannon? Sure its not as hard hitting as your normal Pred or anything, but it is available come t2.

So yeah, I fulfilled you your wish, so back to my question then, will gk Terminators/Paladins get something like a cooldown on build time or something or make em so that they can only get 1 of each or something?


You mean the transport that costs 100 req more than others once it has vehicle armor and a weapon that also can't reinforce on the field?
User avatar
MaxPower
Contributor
Posts: 614
Joined: Mon 11 Feb, 2013 10:18 pm
Location: Leipzig

Re: Patch 2.3 - Tentative Balance changelog

Postby MaxPower » Fri 28 Mar, 2014 11:53 pm

Radio the Forest wrote:
MaxPower wrote:Don't GK have a tank in t2 with a nice lascannon? Sure its not as hard hitting as your normal Pred or anything, but it is available come t2.

So yeah, I fulfilled you your wish, so back to my question then, will gk Terminators/Paladins get something like a cooldown on build time or something or make em so that they can only get 1 of each or something?


You mean the transport that costs 100 req more than others once it has vehicle armor and a weapon that also can't reinforce on the field?


Since when did tanks offer field reinforcements apart from the Land Raider that is.
And yes the GK razorback lascannon upgrade turns the thing into a tank. In tier 2.

Btw. all you wanted to get was a GK tank, I pointed it out, your av tank is the lascannon razorback (which you could get in t2). To answer your "question" yes, now give me an answer to my question. Thank you very much. :)
"A fortress is built with blood and toil. Only by blood and toil may it be taken." Leman Russ
User avatar
Forestradio
Level 5
Posts: 1157
Joined: Sun 13 Oct, 2013 5:09 pm

Re: Patch 2.3 - Tentative Balance changelog

Postby Forestradio » Sat 29 Mar, 2014 12:26 am

No GK terminators should not be given a limit, because they are the only option GK has in t3 (and the LRC is not viable in 1v1) and GK t2 is not that great so you have to go t3 ASAP to get your termies out.
User avatar
MaxPower
Contributor
Posts: 614
Joined: Mon 11 Feb, 2013 10:18 pm
Location: Leipzig

Re: Patch 2.3 - Tentative Balance changelog

Postby MaxPower » Sat 29 Mar, 2014 12:54 am

Which means that GK are flawed and their only saving grace is terminator spam, right? Well how about we come up with some actual fixes for this race then.

Also I asked two questions, the one you've answered and the other question will they get something like a cooldown (not sure if that is possible for units you buy at your hqs).
"A fortress is built with blood and toil. Only by blood and toil may it be taken." Leman Russ
User avatar
Indrid
Moderator
Posts: 898
Joined: Mon 04 Feb, 2013 5:06 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Patch 2.3 - Tentative Balance changelog

Postby Indrid » Sat 29 Mar, 2014 12:57 am

I thought Caeltos mentioned limiting them to 1 of each before. Perhaps I am imagining it, doesn't seem to be in the notes.

They don't have a cooldown time but do have a build time remember, and need to be marched out of HQ. Being able to deep strike is a huge deal. It's not all cut and dry.
User avatar
Forestradio
Level 5
Posts: 1157
Joined: Sun 13 Oct, 2013 5:09 pm

Re: Patch 2.3 - Tentative Balance changelog

Postby Forestradio » Sat 29 Mar, 2014 1:03 am

MaxPower wrote:Which means that GK are flawed and their only saving grace is terminator spam, right? Well how about we come up with some actual fixes for this race then.


Their terminators are getting nerfed in dps, and they aren't going to have the crazy regen that other termies get.

Their t2 is also getting buffed, strike squad might actually be able to shoot things.

So that answers your questions.

And +1 to what Indrid said, GK termies have a 60 sec build time so unless you stockpiled 1300/300 you ain't buying 2 of them just like that
User avatar
MaxPower
Contributor
Posts: 614
Joined: Mon 11 Feb, 2013 10:18 pm
Location: Leipzig

Re: Patch 2.3 - Tentative Balance changelog

Postby MaxPower » Sat 29 Mar, 2014 2:01 am

You wont prolly build them 1 after the other straight away, but you could build them in "short" succession, just saying.
"A fortress is built with blood and toil. Only by blood and toil may it be taken." Leman Russ
User avatar
Black Relic
Level 4
Posts: 846
Joined: Mon 29 Jul, 2013 3:05 am
Location: United States
Contact:

Re: Patch 2.3 - Tentative Balance changelog

Postby Black Relic » Sat 29 Mar, 2014 5:03 am

If Gk eco is that strong to build the termies in quick succession then the victim (hehehe) should just concede.

And I tried snipers vs IG today. Didnt seem to do much else after i toke out the sent. Maybe some replays will help me out here. PM me if you got some.

To fix a termi spam what i would do is put a pred in t3 GK. Pred cannot upgrade (no armor upgrade) and the auto cannon would do less area damage on hit (compared to SM pred), but more single target damage (compared to SM pred). And price would be something like 440\110. Wonder what GK player would think about that. Might just be white noise though. BUT HEYYY HOW BOUT DEM "(insert some interesting noun)
"...With every strike of his sword, with every word of his speech, does he reaffirm the ideals of our honored master..." -From the Teachings of Roboute Guilliman as laid down in the Apocrypha of Skaros. Space Marines Codex pg. 54
User avatar
Kvek
Level 4
Posts: 792
Joined: Mon 01 Apr, 2013 12:26 pm
Location: Czech Republic

Re: Patch 2.3 - Tentative Balance changelog

Postby Kvek » Sat 29 Mar, 2014 6:42 am

game mode?
and if you took it out with snipers then wp, you probably won the game because sent is a core unit for ig
User avatar
realmissyou
Level 1
Posts: 49
Joined: Sat 09 Feb, 2013 2:38 am
Location: TianChao

Re: Patch 2.3 - Tentative Balance changelog

Postby realmissyou » Sat 29 Mar, 2014 9:35 am

when will it release 2.3 patch?
is it May 29th?
Many the Elite Chinese fans are asking about 2.3 patch.
User avatar
BaptismByLoli
Level 4
Posts: 830
Joined: Fri 28 Feb, 2014 8:20 am
Location: The Place Where Wishes Come True

Re: Patch 2.3 - Tentative Balance changelog

Postby BaptismByLoli » Sat 29 Mar, 2014 9:38 am

Sent is core unit for IG in T1 to counter melee units only and to 'tank' for the GM. By late game it wont be a core unit anymore since there will be manticores to counter range blobs, Ogryns to counter initiate and Leman Russes/Baneblades to say screw you to everything (Except AV)
Image
L0thar
Level 2
Posts: 99
Joined: Wed 29 Jan, 2014 7:54 pm

Re: Patch 2.3 - Tentative Balance changelog

Postby L0thar » Sat 29 Mar, 2014 6:46 pm

Gorilla wrote:
L0thar wrote:
* Drop Pod cost increased from 100 to 350
* Drop Pod no longer reinforces units when it lands
* Drop Pod still can still reinforce units
* Drop Pod now drops a squad of Tactical Space Marine squad


:(

I was really hoping this wouldn't get through. Seems like a big nerf in versatility for reasons I already stated in the DP thread. The overall reaction from community also didn't seem that excited like for the Plague Marine changes.

Also the actual saving on the tact squad doesn't seem so great. But I kind of like that it doesn't come with the sergeant. While more useful right after the call in, he is kind of a burden if you need tact for the missile launcher or plasma gun.

What happened with the theoretical temporary buff? It looked like a nice idea.

I don't want to sound too negative - I really like majority of the changes. Just this one means I'm basically stuck with one global (FtE) if going 2 tact as FC (which I like to do).



I actually like it more. Not everyone that reads responds


Well that's true for every thread. But go through the Plague Marine or melee resistance for walker's threads and you'll see much more support for it. Rightfully, they are much better ideas. And btw. you did respond in the drop pod thread, I know you and some others like it.

I'm glad that you'll find some use of it, but to my playstyle it really means just a removal of one global. One I didn't really use that much, but which still has some uses nonetheless.
User avatar
Black Relic
Level 4
Posts: 846
Joined: Mon 29 Jul, 2013 3:05 am
Location: United States
Contact:

Re: Patch 2.3 - Tentative Balance changelog

Postby Black Relic » Sun 30 Mar, 2014 5:38 am

Kvek wrote:game mode?
and if you took it out with snipers then wp, you probably won the game because sent is a core unit for ig


Victory point. Couldnt find much more use for them though after it when down. Judgement of Carrion isnt very friendly for Ninja capping, unless they can infiltrate. But Cats where everywhere so there was none of that.
"...With every strike of his sword, with every word of his speech, does he reaffirm the ideals of our honored master..." -From the Teachings of Roboute Guilliman as laid down in the Apocrypha of Skaros. Space Marines Codex pg. 54
User avatar
Kvek
Level 4
Posts: 792
Joined: Mon 01 Apr, 2013 12:26 pm
Location: Czech Republic

Re: Patch 2.3 - Tentative Balance changelog

Postby Kvek » Sun 30 Mar, 2014 8:37 am

Black Relic wrote:
Kvek wrote:game mode?
and if you took it out with snipers then wp, you probably won the game because sent is a core unit for ig


Victory point. Couldnt find much more use for them though after it when down. Judgement of Carrion isnt very friendly for Ninja capping, unless they can infiltrate. But Cats where everywhere so there was none of that.


Using annihilate, FFA, or TFFA as a "gamemode" for balance is crazy and stupid, by gamemode i meant if it's a 1v1 2v2 or a 3v3
And i'm surprised you couldnt find a use for them after that, they take down STs pretty easily, do a lot of damage to ogryns, and do a lot of damage to spotters, but i guess it was a 3v3 and the ig spammed mantis? :D

Return to “Balance Discussion”



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests