Grey Knight Terminators Variants: Red Cost

Issues dealing with gameplay balance.
User avatar
Forestradio
Level 5
Posts: 1157
Joined: Sun 13 Oct, 2013 5:09 pm

Grey Knight Terminators Variants: Red Cost

Postby Forestradio » Sat 05 Apr, 2014 3:30 pm

Giving Grey Knight Terminators and Paladins a Red Resource Cost:

All statistics taken from the newly updated Codex:
http://www.dawnofwar.info/index.php?pag ... ey_knights

Okay, let's not beat around the bush. Grey Knight Terminators overperform. They shred every other infantry unit in the game, have access to powerful ranged weaponry, and can be buffed to insane levels so that the only thing your opponent can do is cry tears when infiltrated heavy flamer power melee badasses teleport in and proceed to wreck faces everywhere.

Now, having said that, Grey Knight Terminators have an incentive to be strong. They are the only unit in t3 that GKs have, so they need to be powerful in order to make going t3 worthwhile. GKs also have an expensive t2, that while containing several awesome units (libby and purifiers), can require quite a bit of investment. So they need to be powerful and flexible.

That being said, I feel that it's a bit too much at the moment. The upcoming patch reduces the raw dps of GKT, as well as removing "Hammerhand," but they are getting another crowd control ability on top of the energy drain. Grey Knight Terminators also have fantastic synergy with the three "spammable" Grey Knight globals:

Mind Blades: +20% overall damage (ranged, melee, ability) and +10 melee skill. While the damage boost is the most obvious boon, there's another aspect at play here: the melee skill buff. With 80 melee skill, GKTs will toss around other dedicated melee squads (even leveled ones) like nothing. Knockback wins melee fights, and mind blades give knockback.

Dark Excommunication: No enemy unit can use abilities for 12 seconds. Combined with GKT energy drain, this basically ensures that no jump troop is going to jump, no eldar unit is going to fleet, no support commander can buff/debuff, etc. Fantastic global.

Hellfury Strike: Combine this really good global with the incinerators on the Grey Knight Terminators to melt entire ranged blobs. And due to their SHI armor, GKTs take basically no damage from this, so drop it on them in the middle of blobs by all means.

Paladins are another creature altogether, they aren't quite as OP as GKT because of their high power cost, but they still do a bit too much at the moment. Toning down the incinerator for both variants would be a good start.

forestradio suggests: Give GKT and Palas a red cost of 125 zeal. Keep them buildable from the HQ (as opposed to a call-in). As a small compensation, reduce the build time on both variants by 10 seconds (from 60s to 50s).

Thoughts?
User avatar
Aertes
Level 3
Posts: 345
Joined: Tue 25 Mar, 2014 10:41 pm

Re: Grey Knight Terminators Variants: Red Cost

Postby Aertes » Sat 05 Apr, 2014 3:49 pm

If you give them a "red cost" you have to give the army new options to fill their Tier 3. For example, bring the Land Raider Crusader into one of the slots, and... lets say the Dreadknight to the other one, or a Venerable Dreadnought.

Gosh I so hope someone gets to create a game model for Dreadknight.
User avatar
Ar-Aamon
Level 3
Posts: 280
Joined: Sun 24 Mar, 2013 12:07 pm
Location: Titan

Re: Grey Knight Terminators Variants: Red Cost

Postby Ar-Aamon » Sat 05 Apr, 2014 5:07 pm

No way. As long as GK have no other options in T3. I agree with you that something has to be done with the annoying termis spam. Add red cost is the wrong approach. I suggest a limitation of one each variant.

Sent from my RM-821_eu_euro2_224 using Tapatalk
User avatar
Forestradio
Level 5
Posts: 1157
Joined: Sun 13 Oct, 2013 5:09 pm

Re: Grey Knight Terminators Variants: Red Cost

Postby Forestradio » Sat 05 Apr, 2014 5:26 pm

Ar-Aamon wrote: I agree with you that something has to be done with the annoying termis spam. Add red cost is the wrong approach. I suggest a limitation of one each variant.

Sent from my RM-821_eu_euro2_224 using Tapatalk


No, spam is not the problem, you will never see more than two terminator squads on the field at the same time in 1v1, and if you let the GK get two terminators you deserve to lose.

The problem is that you can have terminators and spam globals with them.
User avatar
Kvek
Level 4
Posts: 792
Joined: Mon 01 Apr, 2013 12:26 pm
Location: Czech Republic

Re: Grey Knight Terminators Variants: Red Cost

Postby Kvek » Sat 05 Apr, 2014 5:29 pm

Ar-Aamon wrote:No way. As long as GK have no other options in T3. I agree with you that something has to be done with the annoying termis spam. Add red cost is the wrong approach. I suggest a limitation of one each variant.

Sent from my RM-821_eu_euro2_224 using Tapatalk

A limitiation would basically remove the option -,-
and forest's right and you can always buy a t2 unit to support a t3 unit, so termie spam aint the only option
User avatar
Flash
Level 3
Posts: 281
Joined: Thu 01 Aug, 2013 5:21 am

Re: Grey Knight Terminators Variants: Red Cost

Postby Flash » Sat 05 Apr, 2014 10:19 pm

I don't fundamentally disagree. But getting two of any variant pretty much means no nuke, or harder time accessing (which is the least important of the gk globals imo). Less red cost, say 75-100?
lolzarz
Level 3
Posts: 254
Joined: Thu 06 Mar, 2014 11:17 am
Location: Terra

Re: Grey Knight Terminators Variants: Red Cost

Postby lolzarz » Sun 06 Apr, 2014 3:59 am

This will result in every single one of the Grey Knights' tier 3 options costing Red. Unless they get something new in tier 3, going tier 3 results a trade-off between Mind Blades, Hellfury and Dark Excommunication or Terminators and the Land Raider. I personally would want to keep my globals.

So I'd say if the Terminators cost Red, Grey Knights should get something that does NOT cost red. A dreadknight (not sure if it would overlap with melee dreadnought), building the Land Raider at base without red, or something that is suitably strong but keeps with the fluff.
WEE AR DA SPEHSS MAHREENS! WE AR DA EMPRAH'S FUREH!
User avatar
Aertes
Level 3
Posts: 345
Joined: Tue 25 Mar, 2014 10:41 pm

Re: Grey Knight Terminators Variants: Red Cost

Postby Aertes » Sun 06 Apr, 2014 7:42 pm

lolzarz wrote:So I'd say if the Terminators cost Red, Grey Knights should get something that does NOT cost red. A dreadknight (not sure if it would overlap with melee dreadnought), building the Land Raider at base without red, or something that is suitably strong but keeps with the fluff.


I'd agree with that, but I dont think a Dreadknight would overlap with melee dreadnought, not more than the Avatar overlaps with wraithlords, the Great Unclean One with Khorne Chaos Dreadnought or the Brood Lord with Hive Tyrant or Carnifex.
User avatar
Broodwich
Level 4
Posts: 527
Joined: Fri 12 Apr, 2013 10:04 pm

Re: Grey Knight Terminators Variants: Red Cost

Postby Broodwich » Sun 06 Apr, 2014 8:09 pm

I think this is dumb unless gk get tanks and stuff in t3 that doesn't cost red. Sm terms cost red and shit because sm doesn't need them t3, it's just an option usually overshadowed by a tank
Fas est ab hoste doceri
User avatar
Forestradio
Level 5
Posts: 1157
Joined: Sun 13 Oct, 2013 5:09 pm

Re: Grey Knight Terminators Variants: Red Cost

Postby Forestradio » Mon 07 Apr, 2014 12:02 am

The Terminator Librarian is a perfectly viable option in t3 to support your terminators, even if you didn't buy him in t2.
lolzarz
Level 3
Posts: 254
Joined: Thu 06 Mar, 2014 11:17 am
Location: Terra

Re: Grey Knight Terminators Variants: Red Cost

Postby lolzarz » Mon 07 Apr, 2014 3:49 am

Yes, I know it's viable. But the terminators cost red. Why wouldn't I use interceptors/purifiers and use the red to get mind blades? Combine with Might of Titan and we get, like, 90 melee skill.
WEE AR DA SPEHSS MAHREENS! WE AR DA EMPRAH'S FUREH!
User avatar
Forestradio
Level 5
Posts: 1157
Joined: Sun 13 Oct, 2013 5:09 pm

Re: Grey Knight Terminators Variants: Red Cost

Postby Forestradio » Mon 07 Apr, 2014 11:55 pm

Watch this replay and tell me Grey Knight Terminators aren't overperforming.

For those of you too lazy to watch, they shred level four howling banshees and a seer council with avatar support. That's simply not okay.
Vapor
Level 3
Posts: 427
Joined: Wed 27 Mar, 2013 9:03 am

Re: Grey Knight Terminators Variants: Red Cost

Postby Vapor » Tue 08 Apr, 2014 12:15 am

Radio the Forest wrote:Watch this replay and tell me Grey Knight Terminators aren't overperforming.

For those of you too lazy to watch, they shred level four howling banshees and a seer council with avatar support. That's simply not okay.


Ok then nerf their combat stats. I don't think a red cost on every gk t3 unit is a wise choice.
Follow my stream! twitch.tv/frozenvapor100
User avatar
Torpid
Moderator
Posts: 3538
Joined: Sat 01 Jun, 2013 12:09 pm
Location: England, Leeds

Re: Grey Knight Terminators Variants: Red Cost

Postby Torpid » Tue 08 Apr, 2014 1:34 am

SM termies vs GK termies

4500hp vs 5400hp

210dps vs 160dps + hammerhand (takes them up to 184 for 10 seconds)

WATH gives GK termies 15% damage reduction, however battlecry grants a minimum of a 10% damage buff and then there is the sacred standard which adds a further 25% damage boost. WATH also grants +1 speed. The BC can also use ward to buff the termies with 30% damage resistance and immunity to KB (does this include ability knockback?).

For the emperor grants a 25% damage buff. Mind blades grants 20% damage buff and +10 melee skill. Do GK termies get specials? I've never actually noticed.

Nobody say the L word since it applies both ways, in different ways.

I dunno, I think they're both pretty fine. I don't see why GK termies would be overpoerforming that much. I watched the replay and the termies hardly slaughtered the shees/council/avatar. It was awkward positioning on the eldar's case with models not attacking due to being near cover and the incinerator therefore doing absurd damage. Also, they weren't all attacking the termies simultaneously but one after the other and there was even some IST fire support too.

Later on post that single engagement the termies weren't doing anywhere near as well.

The only nerf GK termies need to their direct combat capabilities is that incinerator. It does way too much damage.
Lets make Ordo Malleus great again!
User avatar
Forestradio
Level 5
Posts: 1157
Joined: Sun 13 Oct, 2013 5:09 pm

Re: Grey Knight Terminators Variants: Red Cost

Postby Forestradio » Tue 08 Apr, 2014 1:41 am

That Torpid Gamer wrote:hammerhand.


Hammerhand also increases splash damage by 50 percent, from 10 per hit to 15 per hit.

That Torpid Gamer wrote:Do GK termies get specials?


Yes. They actually have two different specials, just like the BC and GK libby

That Torpid Gamer wrote:Later on post that single engagement the termies weren't doing anywhere near as well.


That's cuz I lost my interceptors (due to poor play on my part) and couldn't use them for on demand kback and to snare the escaping avatar.

That Torpid Gamer wrote:incinerator. It does way too much damage.


+1000

Return to “Balance Discussion”



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests