Patch 2.5 (WIP)

Issues dealing with gameplay balance.
saltychipmunk
Level 4
Posts: 787
Joined: Thu 01 Aug, 2013 3:22 pm

Re: Patch 2.5 (WIP)

Postby saltychipmunk » Fri 16 Oct, 2015 1:03 pm

the double ranger play works way better in 3v3 games than in 1v1 since you can easily get away with a 2 squad opener and place 6 gens down for the rest of your team. It works better if you have a ton of heavy infantry to shoot at of course.


the ranger suppression is not to be underestimated. being able to suppress lone squads at such a range means you can effectively disable key units or force a lone unit to be exposed since it wont be able to move away and wont be able to shoot. It is a great tool for harassing things; much better than just having the rifles like scouts have.
User avatar
Cheekie Monkie
Level 3
Posts: 362
Joined: Thu 09 Jan, 2014 2:58 pm

Re: Patch 2.5 (WIP)

Postby Cheekie Monkie » Fri 16 Oct, 2015 6:03 pm

Image
Problem, gen farms?
Playing truth or dare with Diomedes: You dare? YOU DARE?!
Tinder with Diomedes: THINK YOU ARE MY MATCH?!
User avatar
HiveSpirit
Level 2
Posts: 153
Joined: Tue 28 Jul, 2015 2:34 am

Re: Patch 2.5 (WIP)

Postby HiveSpirit » Sat 17 Oct, 2015 8:37 pm

Is the IG Multi-laser Turret still bugging and not able to attack power nodes?
Interested in Warhammer 40K: Eternal Crusade (FAQ)? Register with this link to get 4,000 RTP's for free.
Support EC with a Sub/ Vote/ Up/ Hype at: Reddit , mmorpg twitter.com/40kcrusade youtube.com/channel/UCxH-BQF2CRQV6lXTf41xEeg
User avatar
egewithin
Level 5
Posts: 1144
Joined: Mon 26 Jan, 2015 7:08 pm

Re: Patch 2.5 (WIP)

Postby egewithin » Sun 18 Oct, 2015 6:23 am

HiveSpirit wrote:Is the IG Multi-laser Turret still bugging and not able to attack power nodes?


I think that was a manual nerf to those things.
User avatar
Adeptus Noobus
Level 4
Posts: 991
Joined: Sat 15 Feb, 2014 12:47 pm
Contact:

Re: Patch 2.5 (WIP)

Postby Adeptus Noobus » Sun 18 Oct, 2015 8:04 am

Toilailee used them in the most recent tournament to bash power with them and they were working fine.
User avatar
HiveSpirit
Level 2
Posts: 153
Joined: Tue 28 Jul, 2015 2:34 am

Re: Patch 2.5 (WIP)

Postby HiveSpirit » Sun 18 Oct, 2015 12:08 pm

Adeptus Noobus wrote:Toilailee used them in the most recent tournament to bash power with them and they were working fine.

Looked like they bugged in our game.
Interested in Warhammer 40K: Eternal Crusade (FAQ)? Register with this link to get 4,000 RTP's for free.
Support EC with a Sub/ Vote/ Up/ Hype at: Reddit , mmorpg twitter.com/40kcrusade youtube.com/channel/UCxH-BQF2CRQV6lXTf41xEeg
User avatar
Dark Riku
Level 5
Posts: 3083
Joined: Sun 03 Feb, 2013 10:48 pm
Location: Belgium

Re: Patch 2.5 (WIP)

Postby Dark Riku » Sun 18 Oct, 2015 5:22 pm

Neither tm/pc/ig turrets do any damage to the power nodes, this is a bug that got introduced when the nodes were not auto attacked any more.
I'm sure they will fix it whenever they find a solution to it. Feel free to help them :) They damage the generators just fine though.
sebi.costa
Level 2
Posts: 96
Joined: Mon 07 Apr, 2014 4:19 am

Re: Patch 2.5 (WIP)

Postby sebi.costa » Sun 18 Oct, 2015 10:12 pm

* Kasrkin Melta Guns upgrade removed

Why is it being removed?
Laplace's Demon
Level 2
Posts: 81
Joined: Sat 29 Aug, 2015 4:07 am

Re: Patch 2.5 (WIP)

Postby Laplace's Demon » Sun 18 Oct, 2015 10:57 pm

Laplace's Demon wrote:I agree, micro is the answer.... if you're wearing power armor. In practice, when it comes to low health light infantry, your choices are a) bleed or b) concede ground. Given how important holding ground is in Dow 2 (gens at minimum), you choose to bleed.

But, I claim no monopoly on wisdom. Please post a game where you can show how you play eldar without bleed. I will be the first to change how I play eldar if you can...


Dark Riku wrote:Or you can actually micro: position yourself properly into (perfect) cover, have your position covered by a shurycan, be infiltrated thanks to rangers/gates, etc
Please look up those games for yourself and adjust your play accordingly.



I've watched every game indrid ever casted on his current channel, including yours where you play eldar and bleed like slaughtered pig riku.

Even in the situation above (x2 DA, 1x shurican x1 rangers), you're camping and not using eldar mobility which you pay for in req and power, and thus fighting at less efficiency than a faction designed for attrition. And god help you if the opponent has grenade launcher disruption, jump troops (which kills those perfect shields),or detection scouts w/e. AND that's assuming you timed the infiltration drop just perfectly.

It's ok, we know you don't play elderp much any more riku ;) Eldar bleed. There's nothing to be ashamed about. How mad would all the power armor players be if eldar wouldn't fall over when they got sneezed at? I say let eldar bleed just to keep the peace.
Epostle
Level 1
Posts: 28
Joined: Wed 29 Apr, 2015 3:40 pm

Re: Patch 2.5 (WIP)

Postby Epostle » Sun 18 Oct, 2015 11:16 pm

This seems like it's going to be a good patch and will change gameplay a lot.

That's what I love about balance tweaks, it doesn't just fix the current factions, but makes all of them play slightly different :D

Also, it's awesome to see that things that need to be fixed are getting priority over newer content. None-the-less though, I can't wait to see what the next faction is going to be :>
User avatar
Forestradio
Level 5
Posts: 1157
Joined: Sun 13 Oct, 2013 5:09 pm

Re: Patch 2.5 (WIP)

Postby Forestradio » Mon 19 Oct, 2015 12:26 am

Cheekie Monkie wrote:Image
Problem, gen farms?

nothing that wasn't happening already
Image
Atlas

Re: Patch 2.5 (WIP)

Postby Atlas » Mon 19 Oct, 2015 2:20 am

Forestradio wrote:
Cheekie Monkie wrote:Image
Problem, gen farms?

nothing that wasn't happening already
Image


I can't quote this one enough. It's not like Inq couldn't wtfinstantgenbash in early t2 before. Overall, I'm still concerned with the GK vs SM matchup, so I'm kinda hoping SM has some interesting changes for that.
CSM Emperor
Level 2
Posts: 73
Joined: Sun 30 Aug, 2015 10:21 pm

Re: Patch 2.5 (WIP)

Postby CSM Emperor » Mon 19 Oct, 2015 5:02 am

The GK rhino move to t2 from t1 and they can reinforce ?I totaly dislike that. I faced GK with rhinos at t1, even 2 rhino and had no real problem to deal with their rushes.
User avatar
Adeptus Noobus
Level 4
Posts: 991
Joined: Sat 15 Feb, 2014 12:47 pm
Contact:

Re: Patch 2.5 (WIP)

Postby Adeptus Noobus » Mon 19 Oct, 2015 7:49 am

CSM Emperor wrote:The GK rhino move to t2 from t1 and they can reinforce ?I totaly dislike that. I faced GK with rhinos at t1, even 2 rhino and had no real problem to deal with their rushes.

It is not a problem of having to deal with Rhinos in T1 but the synergy between Rhinos and Purgation both being in T1. If you followed GKs development you might still remember the fun of seeing a Rhino in T1 and knowing that a Purgation is inside, rushing your gen farm.

It is a balance issue and thus the decision to move the Rhino to T2 is the correct decision.
saltychipmunk
Level 4
Posts: 787
Joined: Thu 01 Aug, 2013 3:22 pm

Re: Patch 2.5 (WIP)

Postby saltychipmunk » Mon 19 Oct, 2015 12:11 pm

sebi.costa wrote:* Kasrkin Melta Guns upgrade removed

Why is it being removed?


If i were to hazard a guess , it is either
A to remove redundancy since storm troopers had clearly the superior av potential or
B to balance the fact that they now have heavy armor and are by extension slightly more durable than most other melta infantry.

I am thinking it is option A as it has been argued to death that armor type is not nearly as useful in late game as having a solid hp pool is. (since everyone will be bringing their big armor ignoring stuff to blows ayway)

CSM Emperor wrote:The GK rhino move to t2 from t1 and they can reinforce ?I totaly dislike that. I faced GK with rhinos at t1, even 2 rhino and had no real problem to deal with their rushes.


I hate to break it too you but, that is not much of an achievement and is exactly why they are being moved. t1 vehicles suck and the rhino in t1 really has no real purpose. too brittle as an actual transport, too low damage to be an actual threat (in t1) and rather useless in t2 because of its obvious inferiority to other transports (no reinforce , less carry capacity).
User avatar
Dark Riku
Level 5
Posts: 3083
Joined: Sun 03 Feb, 2013 10:48 pm
Location: Belgium

Re: Patch 2.5 (WIP)

Postby Dark Riku » Mon 19 Oct, 2015 12:33 pm

Laplace's Demon wrote:I've watched every game indrid ever casted on his current channel, including yours where you play eldar and bleed like slaughtered pig riku.

Even in the situation above (x2 DA, 1x shurican x1 rangers), you're camping and not using eldar mobility which you pay for in req and power, and thus fighting at less efficiency than a faction designed for attrition. And god help you if the opponent has grenade launcher disruption, jump troops (which kills those perfect shields),or detection scouts w/e. AND that's assuming you timed the infiltration drop just perfectly.

It's ok, we know you don't play elderp much any more riku ;) Eldar bleed. There's nothing to be ashamed about. How mad would all the power armor players be if eldar wouldn't fall over when they got sneezed at? I say let eldar bleed just to keep the peace.
Your stupidity and ignorance is cute. Cuz all my replays end up on Indrid'd channel, rite? Ow wait a second ...
The posts you make only suggest that you know nothing of this game and seriously need to L2P.
You make me wish I could pull people through my screen.

I can only hope that Caeltos reverts the Dire Avenger cost reduction before the patch goes live because they will be way too cost efficient.
Deflaktor
Level 2
Posts: 121
Joined: Mon 20 Jul, 2015 7:03 pm

Re: Patch 2.5 (WIP)

Postby Deflaktor » Tue 20 Oct, 2015 12:56 am

As an Eldar main player here are my thoughts to the Eldar changes:

* Providence health gain increased from 200 to 300
* Enhance speed decreased from 3 to 2
* Enhance duration increased from 6 to 10 seconds

Like these changes in general. Maybe I will use Enhance more often now. 6 seconds were just too short.

* Dire Avenger cost reduced from 300 to 270

Concerned about this change. I feel like at 300 they are too costly. At 270 too cheap. 290 req would sound like a nice price to me. If its gonna be 270, the reinforce cost should stay at 30.

* Fire Dragon armor changed from infantry_fire_resist to heavy_infantry
* Fire Dragon 'passive' aura no longer reduces damage taken, but still grants weapon_knockback immunity. (ability_knockback removed)

I like them being nerfed but the change to heavy_infantry armor will make them just as vulnerable to plasma devs as dark reapers are. I already see it coming, fire dragons getting one-shotted by a plasma dev.

* Dark Reaper health increased from 175 to 200
* Dark Reaper reload duration reduced from 3-3 to 2-2
* Dark Reaper 'Tempest Barrage' ability removed
* Dark Reaper Exarch no longer grants additional +10% health to the squad
* Dark Reaper Exarch now adds +10 sight range to the squad. (If the Exarch dies, this bonus is lost. This is a fail-safe against potential bug so multiple exarch bought on the squad doesn't add several +sight range to the squad)

Very good changes to the Dark Reapers. The sight range gives them a completely different role :) I always wondered where they would fit in the Eldar roster. Having them now alongside a d-cannon might be a good synergy. Cant wait to try that out.
But I think the Exarch should be cheaper. Quite hefty to pay 85/25 for a model which dies easily. Maybe 65/20 would be more suitable? We will see :)
User avatar
Paradise Lost
Level 2
Posts: 90
Joined: Sat 16 May, 2015 1:44 am

Re: Patch 2.5 (WIP)

Postby Paradise Lost » Tue 20 Oct, 2015 1:51 am

I like them being nerfed but the change to heavy_infantry armor will make them just as vulnerable to plasma devs as dark reapers are. I already see it coming, fire dragons getting one-shotted by a plasma dev.

A lot of squads get one-shot by plasma devs. I don't see the problem.
But I think the Exarch should be cheaper. Quite hefty to pay 85/25 for a model which dies easily. Maybe 65/20 would be more suitable? We will see

That may be too cheap for a model that turns the squad into a plasma sniper unit. How about 65/25?
User avatar
Caeltos
Moderator
Posts: 1070
Joined: Sun 03 Feb, 2013 10:49 pm

Re: Patch 2.5 (WIP)

Postby Caeltos » Tue 20 Oct, 2015 2:48 am

Updated OP with some Space Marine changes.
Kvn
Level 3
Posts: 262
Joined: Wed 29 Jul, 2015 8:04 pm

Re: Patch 2.5 (WIP)

Postby Kvn » Tue 20 Oct, 2015 3:41 am

Caeltos wrote:* Force Commander Thunderhammer special no longer tracks an infinite distance. (tracks a distance of maximum 12)



Tears of joy
User avatar
Tengu
Level 1
Posts: 21
Joined: Tue 30 Jun, 2015 12:24 am

Re: Patch 2.5 (WIP)

Postby Tengu » Tue 20 Oct, 2015 6:10 am

>* Force Commander Thunderhammer special no longer tracks an infinite distance. (tracks a distance of maximum 12)
THANK GOD!
Image
My Eternal Crusade code - EC-HMZ40PVE9FLX3
User avatar
Skyward Sorceror
Level 2
Posts: 82
Joined: Mon 05 Oct, 2015 1:04 pm

Re: Patch 2.5 (WIP)

Postby Skyward Sorceror » Tue 20 Oct, 2015 7:39 am

Contain yourself Autarch! Fury Hell (I am so coining that), refrain from turning into a cat and praying to your Xeno gods! But I shall look forward to the next update, I know not how it shall affect my game, but I trust the Elite mod Team. TOOOO INFINITY AND BEYOOOND!!!!
Ten squads die by me.... Look at all the damn I give.
Deflaktor
Level 2
Posts: 121
Joined: Mon 20 Jul, 2015 7:03 pm

Re: Patch 2.5 (WIP)

Postby Deflaktor » Tue 20 Oct, 2015 10:47 am

A lot of squads get one-shot by plasma devs. I don't see the problem.

I don't know any t2 unit which gets one shotted by another t2 unit
User avatar
Asmon
Level 4
Posts: 890
Joined: Mon 29 Apr, 2013 8:01 pm

Re: Patch 2.5 (WIP)

Postby Asmon » Tue 20 Oct, 2015 2:00 pm

Well you don't know them. Still they exist, for a lot of Eldar and IG T2 units do.
User avatar
MaxPower
Contributor
Posts: 614
Joined: Mon 11 Feb, 2013 10:18 pm
Location: Leipzig

Re: Patch 2.5 (WIP)

Postby MaxPower » Tue 20 Oct, 2015 2:16 pm

Caeltos wrote:Space Marines
* Techmarine Venerable Dreadnought cost increased from 600/50/350 to 600/100/350


Call me stupid, but the Vendread costs 600/50/300 right now. So do we have to pay 50 red more as well?

I mean I don't get the Vendread all that often, because its not as good as terminators (cant cap, doesnt have any ranged options), but it was cheaper both in power, req and red, but if you up the power and the red I'll prolly never ever get a Vendread again. Because the impact it has in t3 doesnt justify a price that is so close to Terminators, imho.

On another note, y does the Lord General have a LR call in that doesn't cost any power? I mean the impact of LR is immense and not having to pay power at all is kinda weird.
Last edited by MaxPower on Tue 20 Oct, 2015 2:27 pm, edited 2 times in total.
"A fortress is built with blood and toil. Only by blood and toil may it be taken." Leman Russ
User avatar
Forestradio
Level 5
Posts: 1157
Joined: Sun 13 Oct, 2013 5:09 pm

Re: Patch 2.5 (WIP)

Postby Forestradio » Tue 20 Oct, 2015 2:17 pm

Deflaktor wrote:
A lot of squads get one-shot by plasma devs. I don't see the problem.

I don't know any t2 unit which gets one shotted by another t2 unit

ImageImageImageImage

Image ImageImage
User avatar
Adeptus Noobus
Level 4
Posts: 991
Joined: Sat 15 Feb, 2014 12:47 pm
Contact:

Re: Patch 2.5 (WIP)

Postby Adeptus Noobus » Tue 20 Oct, 2015 2:29 pm

MaxPower wrote:
Caeltos wrote:Space Marines
* Techmarine Venerable Dreadnought cost increased from 600/50/350 to 600/100/350


Call me stupid, but the Vendread costs 600/50/300 right now. So do we have to pay 50 red more as well?

I mean I don't get the Vendread all that often, because its not as good as terminators (cant cap, doesnt have any ranged options), but it was cheaper both in power, req and red, but if you up the power and the red I prolly will never ever get a Vendread again. Because the impact it has in t3 doesnt justify a price that is so close to Terminators, imho.


The Venerable Dreadnought is still a very viable option, even at that price. Do not forget that this variant will be dropped right into combat. It has 1750 hp right from the start and will defeat e.g. a Carnifex 1on1 most of the times. It can be further upgraded with the Dark Age of Technology to give the following benefits to itself and the rest of your army:
Increases health by 300 and improves the inspiration allies receive from kills made by the Dreadnought. Inspiration now increases damage by 35% and reduces received suppression by 30% for 20 seconds.

It is always situational but it still has merit to it.
User avatar
Adeptus Noobus
Level 4
Posts: 991
Joined: Sat 15 Feb, 2014 12:47 pm
Contact:

Re: Patch 2.5 (WIP)

Postby Adeptus Noobus » Tue 20 Oct, 2015 2:55 pm

Deflaktor wrote:
A lot of squads get one-shot by plasma devs. I don't see the problem.


ImageImage
In addition to that, the LC will also one-shot Shoota Nobz, DA + Banshee + Warp Spiders + Dark Reapers - Exarch, you get the picture :)

@Forestradio If my calculations are correct, the Vindicare Assassin does 513 dmg with Mindblades and Target Acquired. Is that right?
saltychipmunk
Level 4
Posts: 787
Joined: Thu 01 Aug, 2013 3:22 pm

Re: Patch 2.5 (WIP)

Postby saltychipmunk » Tue 20 Oct, 2015 3:11 pm

Forestradio wrote:
Deflaktor wrote:
A lot of squads get one-shot by plasma devs. I don't see the problem.

I don't know any t2 unit which gets one shotted by another t2 unit

ImageImageImageImage

Image ImageImage



Wait wait, where the hell is the ravener frenzy global on that thrope . the frenzy thrope guardsman popper is legendary, how can no one have that listed yet?
User avatar
Adeptus Noobus
Level 4
Posts: 991
Joined: Sat 15 Feb, 2014 12:47 pm
Contact:

Re: Patch 2.5 (WIP)

Postby Adeptus Noobus » Tue 20 Oct, 2015 3:17 pm

Guardsmen are not T2 units

Return to “Balance Discussion”



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests