Torpid wrote:I happen to recall a 3v3 I was playing yesterday with you good sir Riku in which my team ended up winning on what seemed mostly to be a T2 beacon.
I have not saved that replay, all I know is that the contested VP side didn't seem to do particularly well. The reason as to why I do not know. Bringing in a single luls 3's game as a base for argument isn't exactly a good idea either.
Torpid wrote:You got a fast LRR but it couldn't do what it normally would do in pushing us back and holding the contested VP simply because I had a beacon behind a shot blocker.
I'd hardly call my LRR a fast one but okay. The reason it couldn't do anything was because of the abundance of AV weapons that seem to be in place at the contested VP side. Again, wasn't paying any attention to that side.
Torpid wrote:Which was a stupid response, which is why it resulted in a sarcastic response.
Your statement of essentially "counter beacons using immolator" is entirely unhelpful since as Oddnerd was pointing out, most people don't play WL every single game.
Can you two not read or do you guys just want to make me look like a bad guy or something? The response was to you saying that beacon play is only countered by beacon play which is not true in the slightest! Nobody here asked for counterplay to the becon either. And even then it was already touched upon a bit by Atlas. This is a balance thread, not a strategy discussion now is it?
Torpid wrote:It's not that deep darling. Do calm down. Don't pretend your playing your own meta or have been particularly creative with your playstyle

I'm not claiming anything here! Where do you guys keep getting these ridiculous thought processes from??
Flash wrote:I have been reading the whole thread.
Looking at the rest of your post I highly doubt that.
Flash wrote:Your initial statement was silly. Only one commander has an immolator.
It was a response to Torpid saying the only thing you can do is have another becon, which is not true, the immolator upgrade is one of many things that you can do.
Flash wrote:And you were responding to Oddnerd for that.
Again read the thread, that was a response to Toprid.
Flash wrote:I wouldn't have used sarcasm in my initial response to your immolator comment, but it was justified in it's usage. I have problems with "git gud" as a response and I jumped on you for it. I still stand by it being poor form to stay.
You have a problem with my sarcastic response to another sarcastic response? Ever heard of the term hypocrit?
Flash wrote:I'm not contesting your skill. I don't think there is anyone here who would deny that. The condescension is a bit thick though, and the game balance doesn't revolve around only you or your experience. The mod is designed to be balanced around high level play. But there's more people in that than just you.
I've never claimed that the game balance has to resolve around my experience. What kind of bullshit claim is this??
I'm sorry that stating facts comes over as condescending to you but it's just the truth. The sky here was blue today, please don't be offended by that.
Way to derail the thread btw

Not that this topic deserves much attention imo anyway.