How about a little ranking system? Could use some feedback!
Re: How about a little ranking system? Could use some feedba
id actually rly like to stream again since it was huge fun when i did it
once i get a new laptop id stream my own ladder games / cast others np. Idk about a set timetable im optimistic that u can just find ppl via the steam group.
edit @lulgrim: i'd love to see the ladder based on MRTs regardless, since tourney games are just different to customs/ladder games.
once i get a new laptop id stream my own ladder games / cast others np. Idk about a set timetable im optimistic that u can just find ppl via the steam group.
edit @lulgrim: i'd love to see the ladder based on MRTs regardless, since tourney games are just different to customs/ladder games.
Re: How about a little ranking system? Could use some feedba
Wurgl wrote:i'd love to see the ladder based on MRTs regardless, since tourney games are just different to customs/ladder games.
Thats kinda the truth. Even back in retail ppl didn't rly care about their position in ladder and played it just to get decent evenly matched games.
Swift I: You're not a nerd, you're just a very gifted social spastic
Re: How about a little ranking system? Could use some feedba
Yeah, problem is people don't like to play "ladder" in custom games as Lugim said. 
And could everyone check their results and pm Lulgrim if something is wrong with their results? Because there were a lot of issues (drops, player switches, etc).
And could everyone check their results and pm Lulgrim if something is wrong with their results? Because there were a lot of issues (drops, player switches, etc).
Re: How about a little ranking system? Could use some feedba
Lulgrim wrote:Rataxas wrote:Dont think ladder will work in system BO 3
I wouldn't necessarily call it a ladder right now, but as long as there are matches between players we can calculate mathematical skill ratings based on who wins whom. Best of whatever doesn't really matter.
Problem is that in elimination only a small # of players can accumulate enough matches to get a reliable rating (low RD). And even that takes a few cycles. But ratings were asked for and now we have some.
If players want to submit games in between tournaments to lower their RD, that's great, I can include the data. It would be a lot better. But the system has existed for a while now and though some people have indicated interest, there have been no submissions.Uncle Milty wrote:Maybe really go for a league like system with pairings according to a somewhat timetable-ish plan. Give those people a week or two to agree on a date and time to play. This could probabely increase overall community activity and communication between players on general.
Sounds good if you can just get it rolling. Anyone willing to write up the system? Make a committee and start typing...
act. if i understand you right you want me to send a custom games to you which one i have lost / won and based on this you will update the ranking system ?
Re: How about a little ranking system? Could use some feedba
As long as both players agree at the start of the game that it will be considered a ladder match for rating.
Re: How about a little ranking system? Could use some feedba
Skill ratings are updated, the situation now is immediately after MRT#3.
Re: How about a little ranking system? Could use some feedba
Lulgrim wrote:Skill ratings are updated, the situation now is immediately after MRT#3.
Link?
Swift I: You're not a nerd, you're just a very gifted social spastic
Re: How about a little ranking system? Could use some feedba
Post #26 or go to main website and pick 'Ratings' from the menu
Re: How about a little ranking system? Could use some feedba
I've been wurgl'd.
Swift I: You're not a nerd, you're just a very gifted social spastic
Re: How about a little ranking system? Could use some feedba
I put a win % number in there, and there's now an option of having your nationality displayed by a flag (see Wurgl, Toilailee and Dark Riku match history pages for preview) -- let me know if you want yours shown/hidden there.
We may add a favorite/best hero thingy as well and recording extra data for each match would allow pulling stuff like worst opposing hero or best map later if we want (this got way out of hand when I talked about it with Eerie).
We may add a favorite/best hero thingy as well and recording extra data for each match would allow pulling stuff like worst opposing hero or best map later if we want (this got way out of hand when I talked about it with Eerie).
Re: How about a little ranking system? Could use some feedba
Awesome. I like the a lot. If you can add those other things in would be great too.
Re: How about a little ranking system? Could use some feedba
What Riku said. Really cool.
Lets make Ordo Malleus great again!
Re: How about a little ranking system? Could use some feedba
What does RD mean please?
@Lulgrim I would like a flag near my name please
@Lulgrim I would like a flag near my name please
Re: How about a little ranking system? Could use some feedba
ratings deviation
Re: How about a little ranking system? Could use some feedba
Lulgrim wrote:(this got way out of hand when I talked about it with Eerie).
I can imagine.
Swift I: You're not a nerd, you're just a very gifted social spastic
-
crazyman64335

- Posts: 329
- Joined: Mon 06 May, 2013 2:15 am
Re: How about a little ranking system? Could use some feedba
i'm ahead of holyhammer somehow....
FUCK YEA
FUCK YEA
Re: How about a little ranking system? Could use some feedba
[WHElite] R3D B34RD wrote:What does RD mean please?
Rating Deviation (singular), meaning the estimated accuracy of your skill rating. E.g. your rating 1453 RD 167 means your skill is probably 1286-1620 so the estimate is not very reliable yet.
[WHElite] R3D B34RD wrote:@Lulgrim I would like a flag near my name please
Well I don't know your country...
Re: How about a little ranking system? Could use some feedba
My country is Malta Lulgrim
http://wiwibloggs.com/wp-content/upload ... -flag1.JPG
Looks something like that.
Also thank you for explaining what RD means
Much appreciated. 
http://wiwibloggs.com/wp-content/upload ... -flag1.JPG
Looks something like that.
Also thank you for explaining what RD means
Re: How about a little ranking system? Could use some feedba
Is your flag correct now R3D?
I rethought the match history a little and made a new database with extra metadata. I have copied some MRT1 matches there, you can preview how it will be @ http://www.dawnofwar.info/index.php?page=ratings-2 (click the "list all matches" link at top right).
This new DB will allow printing new stats like favorite/best hero, best/worst map, etc. like we discussed above. And also global stats like most popular/effective hero, etc.
I rethought the match history a little and made a new database with extra metadata. I have copied some MRT1 matches there, you can preview how it will be @ http://www.dawnofwar.info/index.php?page=ratings-2 (click the "list all matches" link at top right).
This new DB will allow printing new stats like favorite/best hero, best/worst map, etc. like we discussed above. And also global stats like most popular/effective hero, etc.
Re: How about a little ranking system? Could use some feedba
this is awesome
lulgrium you are a god
lulgrium you are a god
Re: How about a little ranking system? Could use some feedba
That is how men see us primarchs
Re: How about a little ranking system? Could use some feedba
And I got rickrolled 
Re: How about a little ranking system? Could use some feedba
One thing I'm still a bit fifty-sixty about is... Should I make the rating changes after each individual game, after all? Basically the formula functions most accurately when you have 5-10 games per round of calculation - but it can be used on a match-by-match basis as well.
The appeal is mostly the more frequent updates, and I assume it would be more forgiving to the people repeatedly knocked out of tournaments by top players when everyone is still unrated (so you have a huge losing streak vs. 1500 rated players, only they were always Hammer, Wurgl, Riku etc.)
The appeal is mostly the more frequent updates, and I assume it would be more forgiving to the people repeatedly knocked out of tournaments by top players when everyone is still unrated (so you have a huge losing streak vs. 1500 rated players, only they were always Hammer, Wurgl, Riku etc.)
Re: How about a little ranking system? Could use some feedba
From what I can tell updating after every game seems more fair.
But I think you already knew my opinion on the matter ^^
But I think you already knew my opinion on the matter ^^
Re: How about a little ranking system? Could use some feedba
Yes it is good Lulgrim
Thank you very much.
Re: How about a little ranking system? Could use some feedba
Also I like the new system Lulgrim.
Re: How about a little ranking system? Could use some feedba
Dark Riku wrote:From what I can tell updating after every game seems more fair.
If I do it like that, the lists will look like this: http://www.dawnofwar.info/index.php?pag ... ayer=Tyger
Re: How about a little ranking system? Could use some feedba
Hmmm maybe it should stay the same for an entire match?
So update after every Bo3/Bo5? This stuff is hard ...
So update after every Bo3/Bo5? This stuff is hard ...
Re: How about a little ranking system? Could use some feedba
updating the ratings from match to match sounds pretty fair to me, it does some "damage control" when people lose to someone who should be way above their rating as you pointed out
also, this represents a ladder, where the updates would be from match to match aswell
also, this represents a ladder, where the updates would be from match to match aswell
Return to “Community General Discussion”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest







