Page 1 of 1
FC Thunder Hammer Damage seems 2b2 good
Posted: Thu 27 Jul, 2017 2:56 pm
by Rostam
Thunder hammer for force commander seems to do way more damage that intended especially on infantry squads on retreat . its especial does not track any more like the previous patches but the damage is way too high on retreat especially
Re: FC Thunder Hammer Damage seems 2b2 good
Posted: Thu 27 Jul, 2017 5:17 pm
by Atlas
I haven't been watching the casts lately, but I assume there is some proof in there?
Re: FC Thunder Hammer Damage seems 2b2 good
Posted: Thu 27 Jul, 2017 7:29 pm
by Rostam
i have seen this happen while battle cry was activated on retreat noticed that in a game which i was playing today (SM v Eldar) unfortuantley did not save that game . but if will keep in mind to show it if it catches my eye again
Re: FC Thunder Hammer Damage seems 2b2 good
Posted: Tue 01 Aug, 2017 11:26 am
by Nurland
Battle Cry is melee damage and melee does bonus on retreat. That could explain this...
Re: FC Thunder Hammer Damage seems 2b2 good
Posted: Thu 31 Aug, 2017 9:17 am
by Antandron
Re: FC Thunder Hammer Damage seems 2b2 good
Posted: Sat 09 Sep, 2017 1:33 pm
by The Licking Boogyman
If you guys want the best example of damage of the beasthammer then this video should be fine 11:39
https://youtu.be/RBXo3Xm6tK8
Re: FC Thunder Hammer Damage seems 2b2 good
Posted: Sat 09 Sep, 2017 5:41 pm
by Adeptus Noobus
The only thing I can see here is a huge infantry blob. If you blob vs PlasmaDevs, they will seem OP as well. I will not defend the Telehammer (which is the real issue, not the Hammer itself) but this is not the best showcase of it.
Re: FC Thunder Hammer Damage seems 2b2 good
Posted: Sun 24 Sep, 2017 5:56 am
by Rostam
Damage on retreat to infantry when battle cry is activated; seems to be the big problem. Reking infintry eldar,nids,ork blobs
Re: FC Thunder Hammer Damage seems 2b2 good
Posted: Sun 24 Sep, 2017 6:48 am
by Rostam
Antandron wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2934h4FNx7A&index=13&list=WL
Telehammer makes an appearance at 12:40
could u mark the timing on this video which it does that ?